Nash Family & Farm History
HISTORY OF THE NASH FAMILY AND PROPERTY
The Nash family of Henry County migrated to the area in the
1830's and 1840's from Laurens County, South Carolina, where
they had prospered during the early years of the nineteenth
century. However, exhausted soils and a national depression in
the 1820's prompted the family to scout for new opportunities.
(McConnell 1992). John
Nesbit Nash was in Henry County by 1836, when he purchased LL
155 of the 6th district, about a mile south of Nash Farm
property. In 1841, he purchased 125 acres to the northeast of
the Nash Farm, which included the east half of LL 102, from
William Crawford, (Henry County Superior Court {HCHS} 1836: Deed
Book {DB} H:462; 1841: DB J:512.
In 1845, John Nesbit Nash's oldest son, Elihu Nash purchased 150
acres known as the Crawford place in LL 102, 103, and 122, which
appears to have included the 125 acres purchased by his father
four years before. Elihu Nash purchased the land from R.M.
Milner for $350. This land included the approximately 10-acre
tract in the northeast corner of LL 122 north of McDonough Road
that is part of the Nash Farm. Elihu Nash later added to his
holdings in LL 122 by purchasing 123 acres from Benjamin Nail in
1853. This property, for which Elihu paid $900, appears to have
included the land north of Walnut Creek on which the present
Nash house and outbuildings are located (HCSC 1845: DB L:43;
1853: DB O:131). Because the price paid was considerably more
than Elihu had paid for more acreage in 1845, it is likely that
improvements had already been made to the property.
Elihu Nash probably established a residence on the Crawford
Place in 1845, or occupied an existing dwelling on the property,
which would have been on the north side of McDonough Road.
After purchasing the 123-acre Neal property in 1853, he may have
built a new house on the south side of the road on the current
Nash Farm property. The 33-year-old Elihu appears in the 1850
census of Henry County with his wife Elizabeth and five children
between the ages of 10 and 2. There is also a five-year-old
girl whose last name is Adams, born in South Carolina, living in
the house (U.S. Bureau of the Census 1850). She is likely an
orphaned relative. Nash is listed as a farmer whose estate was
valued at $1,000. At that time, he had not purchased the 123
acres in Land Lot 122 that was considerably more valuable than
the land to the north that he had purchased in 1845.
In 1858, Elihu Nash sold the entire property to his older
brother, Thompson Edward Nash, and moved to a farm in the Bear
Creek District of Henry County near Hampton. Thompson Nash had
been in Georgia since about 1835 and had purchased land just to
the northeast of his brother's farm on the McDonough Road in the
1840s (see
Figure 9). He had lived briefly in what is now Clayton
County at Orr's Crossing in the 1830s, and then had moved to
Campbell County where he resided near his uncle, James
Abercrombie. In 1846, he reportedly bought a farm about three
miles east of Lovejoy in Fosterville (Nash Family Bible in
possession of Ron Brown of Jonesboro). This is consistent with
deeds that show that between 1847 and 1849, he purchased three
tracts totaling about 450 acres in Land Lots 72, 89, and 90 of
the Sixth District of Henry County, on the north side of
McDonough Road (HCHS 11835: DB G:395; 1847: DB L:468, 483; 1849:
DB M:52; 1858: DB O:593). He apparently occupied the house on
that property that is still standing, just to the northeast of
the Nash Farm property (see
Figure 9) (Ron Brown, personal communication
20, June, 2006).
Thompson E. Nash was a minister who contributed land for the
County Line Methodist Church (now County Line Congregational
Christian Church), and also served as postmaster of Fosterville,
which at that time apparently was located on McDonough Road near
the County Line Methodist Church or possibly near Walnut Creek.
Thompson Nash must have fared very well with his Henry County
farm over the next ten years. In 1856 and 1858, he purchased
the 270 acres from his brother, Elihu, for $1,750, to which he
added 80 acres on the west side of Land Lot 102 (see
Figure 9) (HCSC 1856: DB O:619; 1858: DB:616, 617). By 1860
he owned 26 slaves and was one of the largest slaveholders in
Clayton County. His real estate was valued at over $20,000, and
his personal estate, which included the slaves, was valued at
over $21,000. He lived with his wife Elizabeth Shaw Nash and
their 8 children (U.S. Bureau of the Census 1860).
In 1858, Clayton County was created, and Land Lot 122 became a
part of that county. It is not clear if Thompson Nash moved to
the property he purchased from his brother or remained on his
earlier farm on the north side of the road. According to the
family Bible, "about 1855 he built a new house and moved the old
house where it now stands near the church." This presumably
refers to the County Line Church, just to the northeast of the
Nash Farm. If the date is correct, the new house would have
been built on the original farm north of McDonough Road, and the
fact that the old house was moved when the new one was built
suggests that the new house was built on or near the site of the
old one. However, the date is given as an estimate, and it may
be that that the new house was built on the property he
purchased from his brother. This is supported by the fact that
Thompson Nash is listed in Clayton County in the 1860 census,
while his old farm would have still been in Henry County (Brown
n.d; U.S. Bureau of the Census 1860).
Thompson Nash apparently did not serve in the Civil War, but his
younger brother Elihu did. He was a number of other members of
the family enlisted in Company H, 27th Regiment, Georgia
Volunteer Infantry, later known as "Zachry Rangers," when the
Civil War broke out. Among those in his company was Thompson E.
Nash's son, John Pleasant Shaw Nash, who was 19 years old in
1860 and living in his father's household. There is some
evidence that Thompson Nash had set up his son in a house on the
side of the McDonough road in Land Lot 122 just prior to the
Civil War. John P.S. Nash would have been about 20 years old
and unmarried when the war began. He definitely moved to the
property sometime after the war and was later granted the lot by
his father.
One account of the Civil War action at the site mentions that
there was an abandoned farm, and the Ruger map from the Civil
War seems to indicate a vacant house in this location (see
Figure 8). His regiment was serving in Virginia during the
Atlanta Campaign, which may explain why the Nash Farm was
described in one Civil War account as abandoned. If he was
starting a household at the beginning of the war but had no
family, it would have been abandoned while he was away. If
Thompson Nash or some other family member had been living on the
Nash Farm property at the start of the Civil War, there likely
would have been family there during the war.
John P.S. Shaw Nash was wounded in the hip at Bentonville, N.C.
in the final days of the war and was paroled on May 1, 1865. He
returned to Clayton County by 1870, when he is listed in the
census rolls for that county. John P. Nash, then 29, is listed
in the Jonesboro Post Office District of Clayton County in
1870. He was married to 19-year-old Mary Jane McCollough, and
had a 3-month old boy named Oliver. He reported no real estate
or personal estate. The curious thing about the census listing
for John P. Shaw for 1870 is that he is listed as a resident of
an African American household headed by 38-year-old James Brown,
a "farm laborer/farmer," who was married and had three young
children. A 15-year-old African American girl named Jane Nash
lived in the house as well and worked as a domestic servant.
A pencil line in the census ledger separates the blacks in the
household from the whites, but there is no indication that this
was a separate household (Brown n.d.; U.S. Bureau of the Census
1870). Whites and blacks rarely lived under the same roof at
this time, but it would be almost inconceivable that the black
family would be listed ahead of the white one in the census
return, which put the head of the household first, followed by
immediate family members and boarders or other relatives. Four
of the adjacent households were also occupied by black families,
including 48-year-old Joseph Nash, who may have been a former
slave of the Nash family. It is possible that a number of
former Nash family slaves were residing on the large Thompson
Nash property on McDonough Road, and that John P.S. Nash and his
family were occupying one of their houses while building a new
house for himself and his family.
Whoever was living on the south side of the road in the 1860s,
Thompson Nash still owned the property. He is not listed in the
1870 census and may have suffered considerable financial losses
as a result of the emancipation of his slaves and damage to his
property. It appears that John P.S. Nash had moved to his
father's property on McDonough Road by 1880, although the exact
location of his house is not known. Nash's neighbors included
members of the Konkle and Dorsey families, who are known to have
resided in the area. He is listed as a farmer, but still owned
no real estate. At that time he and his wife had four
children: Lula, 10, Quincy, 5, Minnie, 4, Emmet, 1, Oliver, his
infant son in 1870, must have died during the preceding 10 years
(U.S. Bureau of the Census 1880). In 1880 the family posed for
a formal portrait, shown in (Figure
10).
In October of 1881, John P.S. Nash bought Land Lot 101 and a
small portion of Land Lot 102 from John Abercrombie and Rachel
Abercrombie (Clayton County Superior Court (CCSC) 1881: DB
C:382, 384). The Abercrombie's were closely allied with the
Nash Family in Henry and Clayton counties. The Civil War map in
(Figure
7) shows a "Wid. Crumby" to the northwest of the site and
this was probably actually a member of the Abercrombie family.
According to Evans (1996:438), Union cavalrymen had stopped at
Rachel Abercromby's house asking where the Dorsey plantation
was on the morning of August 20, 1864, before the action at
Lovejoy's Station. The name Crumby is probably a variation of
Abercromby. The location of the house on the map is very close
to where Land Lot 101 would be.
In July 1882, Thompson E. Nash traded Land Lot 122 to John P. S.
Nash for Land Lot 101 that John had purchased from the
Abercrombies. A little over a year later, for "the love and
affection" he had for John P. S. Nash and "for the better
maintenance and support of him," Thompson Nash gave John P. Nash
approximately 202 acres in Land Lot 101 and a fraction of Land
Lot 102. John Nash then held about 420 acres in the area.
(CCSC 1882: DB C:514, D:6, 9). He probably lived on the south
side of the road in Land Lot 122, perhaps where he had been
living for sometime.
A photograph from about 1910 shows an elderly John Pleasant Shaw
Nash and his family on the porch of the old house that is still
standing on the Nash Farm property (Figure
10). Another photograph shows a barn on the site (Mark
Pollard, personal communication, from original photographs in
the possession of Ronald Brown). Nash sold the land on the
north side of McDonough Road in Land Lot 101 in 1904, retaining
only the 202 acres in Land Lot 122, what is now known as the
Nash Farm property ( CCSC 1904: DB K:58).
Nash had at least five children, but two sons died young, and
one daughter died when only 17. John Quincy Nash (1875-1956)
and Minnie Nash (1876-1962) both lived to adulthood. Quincy
Nash had one son from his first marriage; but when he divorced,
his ex-wife took his son to live with her in Arkansas where she
remarried. One of Nash's daughters married and had a daughter.
John P. S. Nash died in 1924, and his son, John Q. Nash,
apparently continued to reside on the property. He added
approximately 73 acres in Land Lot 104 to the estate. In 1941,
Quincy Nash asked the court, as J. P. S. Nash's "son and only
next of kin entitled to any interest in said estate," to appoint
Miss Ruth Harris as the administrator of the estate. His
sister, Minnie Nash, who was still alive at the time, may have
already conveyed her interest in the property to her brother.
The court compiled with Quincy Nash's request, and Harris had
the Nash Farm surveyed for sale (Brown n.d; Clayton County
Probate Court 1941: Minute Book G:48). The plat of the property
(see
Figure 10a) made in 1941 (CCSC 1941: Plat Book 1:213) shows
that there were four structures in Land Lot 122, three on the
south side of Babbs Mill Road and one on the north side (Figure
12). Lot 122 had been divided into approximately 52-acre
parcels for sale, but the lot was sold as one tract to O.J.
Coogler in 1941. Coogler apparently lost the property in 1942
and it was eventually acquired by Georgia Savings Bank & Trust
Company, which sold it to Hugh Schneider in 1949. Schneider
also acquired 77 acres adjoining Land Lot 122 in the eastern
part of Land Lot 123 at the same time (CCSC 1941: DB 36:328;
1942: DB36:586; 1949: DB 65:547; 1949: DB 69:222).
The Schneiders built two new houses on the property as well as a
barn. Hugh Schneider sold the property in 1975 to B. A.
Barnette, who owned it for 10 years. Barnette built a third
residence on the property as well as another barn. He sold the
property to James S. and Paul C. Rosser and Michael Strayhorn in
1985. In 1991 the property was acquired by the Gresham family
and operated a cattle farm until it was occupied by Henry County
for use as a park.
The original house on the property has been extensively modified
over time. Henry County tax records give the date of
construction of the house as 1920 (Henry County Tax Assessor's
Office 2006), and this is certainly too late, based on the
photographs of the house and its association with John P. S.
Nash, a long-time resident. The reason for the 1920 date is
probably because the Nash home was located within the Clayton
County boundary line in 1919 and relocated into the Henry County
line in 1920. However, assertions that the house was in place
during the Civil War cannot be proven from the available
evidence, although it seems likely that some house stood on or
near the site from at least the 1850's. Five unknown house site
ruins were also identified on the Nash Farm property during the
March 2007 archaeological survey. These house site ruins may
also one day shed further valuable historical information.
Further architectural and archaeological investigations of the
Nash house, material components, and surrounding areas within
the property could help us understand the answers to these
questions.
Nash Farm Family History Menu Links